Patrick Willer é autor de um texto publicado ontem no americano Digitalist Magazine que não só é atual, como toca no tendão de Aquiles de muitas organizações públicas e privadas portuguesas que continuam a ter enormes dificuldades em canalizar algum do tempo para valorizarem a capacidade crítica dos seus colaboradores.
Na sua abordagem ressalta um pensamento do filósofo, mais do que atual, necessário para que as organizações tenham sucesso: " mentes fortes discutem ideias, mentes medianas discutem acontecimentos, mentes fracas discutem pessoas".
Who Is Your Socrates In Your Organization?
The ancient Greek philosopher Socrates didn’t leave any writings, but his thoughts left an eternal echo. We know from his students, one of whom was Plato, that Socrates challenged and provoked people around him to think for themselves.More than 2,400 years later, we could use some of Socrates’ thought provoking. Who is your Socrates in your organization?
Think for yourself
Socrates’ motto was, “You have to know yourself before you can say something about yourself or about what you can know.” He asked people questions like:What is wisdom? What is brave? What is righteous? – questions that are still very relevant today. Thinking for yourself and challenging the status quo will keep you on the inventing side of business and life.Socratic dialogue
Socrates had a technique he used to help people think for themselves, which we call the dialectic method of inquiry or the Socratic dialogue. It would be fantastic if we used the Socratic dialogue more when we communicate with colleagues and clients. All our technological advancements haven’t helped us to focus on a conversation, digging deeper and asking questions about the true meaning behind our words. Socrates was a master at that.But why is this so difficult for us? Two aspects that make it hard:
- Lack of focus prevents us from asking the right questions. Since we multitask our way through life, our brains have become increasingly strong in tying small pieces of information together. We quickly connect thoughts (of our own) to words we hear. And we quickly conclude we have a full picture — even though it’s impossible to fully understand what somebody else is thinking and trying to convey. A simple example: If a colleague says to you, “Job well done,” you could quickly – and incorrectly – assume your performance was good. You’d better ask follow up questions to your colleague: What do you mean by “well done”? Can you explain further? That way you will discover more about your performance and gain knowledge that you can actually use to your benefit.
- Fear prevents us from using the dialectic method, especially fear of making the other person uncomfortable. Asking the why question a couple of times can be both liberating and confrontational at the same time. Asking the wrong way might scare somebody into wondering why you keep asking questions. And even if you do it the right way, you might get to levels where people (consciously or unconsciously) have not yet rationalized their thought – which means you enter very private territory, which can be terrifying to others.The Socratic dialogue is a true skill to master, but it definitely pays off when you are able to reach a deeper rapport with the people around you.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário